Great apes are curious in captivity, but in the wild they’re cautious around unfamiliar objects, recent research reveals.
The analysis, which researchers say is the first to measure orangutans’ response to novelty in the wild, was published in the journal Scientific Reports. It documents the behavior of human-habituated orangutans living in a Sumatra reserve.
When they’re in captivity, great apes usually spend a long time exploring new objects. But researchers knew little about how that curiosity might play out in the wild.
Previously, scientists had planted novel items throughout the forest at Suaq Balimbing, a protected biodiversity area in Sumatra whose orangutans are monitored by conservation biologists. But during those earlier experiments, the apes were so cautious of the new items that the experiments failed.
Advertisement
More recently, the biologists came up with a more enticing way to spark the orangutans’ curiosity, planting a piece of tree trunk filled with local forest honey on trees near the orangutans. Then scientists watched as the apes encountered the familiar but intriguingly novel object during 170 trials.
The ways the orangutans expressed their curiosity varied by age, the biologists found. Immature orangutans looked “significantly longer” at the object vs. other apes, checking it out for an average of 233 seconds compared with 103 seconds for mothers and 34 seconds for sexually mature males. Immature orangutans also were quicker to approach the object and show agitation while doing so.
The apes rarely touched the branch, often using a tool such as a stick to do so. They were also less likely to approach the honey-stuffed branch in areas where food was abundant.
Advertisement
But social connections seemed to influence their curiosity: When an orangutan was accompanied by another ape, it was more likely to approach and touch the object.
In a news release, the researchers say the study’s results shed light on how human curiosity may have evolved.
“We often think of learning and innovation as solo acts, but this might not have been the case in our early history,” said Caroline Schuppli, director of the orangutan research project at Suaq Balimbing and the study’s first author. “If novelty was the spark, then our social lives might have provided the accelerant.”
This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary for analytics and its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy, including the personalization and analysis of ads and content. If you want to learn more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy.
By clicking on Accept you are agreeing to the placement of cookies on your device.
Further use of our site shall be considered as consent. You may view our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy here for more information.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.