In 2018, fires raged throughout the nation — and their victims weren’t just those who perished in the flames. New research attributes 20,000 premature deaths in the United States that year to small smoke particles in the air from human-caused fires.
The study, published last week in the journal Environmental Research Letters, looked at human-ignited wildfires and agricultural fires, which are used to manage vegetation on farms. Researchers used data from the U.S. Forest Service’s database, which collects information on the location of fires, their dates, and details about their containment and causes. They then simulated the emissions of the fires in 2003 and in 2018, a particularly active fire year.
Fires belch out fine particulates known as PM2.5. These tiny particles are 2.5 microns or smaller in width — about one-thirtieth the width of a strand of hair. That means they’re small enough to be inhaled deeply into the lungs, and for that reason they are the riskiest particles to human health, the Environmental Protection Agency says.
Advertisement
In the past two decades, over 80 percent of smoke in the United States was human-caused, the researchers found. In 2018, human-caused fires accounted for more than 67 percent of all PM2.5 emissions.
Agricultural fires were more common in the Southeast, while human-sparked wildfires dominated in the West and caused large swaths of smoke pollution. This was especially true in California, where levels of PM2.5 smashed recommended thresholds during the Camp and Mendocino Complex Fires.
The scientists looked at the estimated population exposed to PM2.5 and linked that data with other research on how smoke exposure contributes to early deaths. Overall, they attributed 20,000 premature deaths to human-sparked fires in 2018 and another 7,400 to 2003 fires.
“Now we know that humans can play a pivotal role in reducing PM2.5 concentrations, we should be putting policies, regulations, and management plans in place to reduce human-ignited fires,” said Therese Carter, a public health researcher at George Washington University who co-wrote the study, in a news release.
The researchers conclude that there is “considerable potential” for humans to mitigate smoke exposure and the burden it places on public health. They call for more research on how prescribed burns and other fire management tactics might limit wildfires.
This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary for analytics and its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy, including the personalization and analysis of ads and content. If you want to learn more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy.
By clicking on Accept you are agreeing to the placement of cookies on your device.
Further use of our site shall be considered as consent. You may view our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy here for more information.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.