• Call-in Numbers: 917-633-8191 / 201-880-5508

  • Now Playing

    Title

    Artist

    TV host Piers Morgan defended his decision to identify the two members of the royal family at the centre of the furore, saying it was “blindingly obvious” they were not guilty of racism.

    Prince Harry and Meghan are yet to break their silence after the Dutch translation of Omid Scobie’s book Endgameidentified two royals at the centre of a racism row.

    King Charles and the Princess of Wales were named as the royals accused of raising questions about the skin colour of Prince Harry and Meghan’s son, Archie, before he was born.

    The Sussexes - who first made the claims in their 2021 interview with Oprah - have been silent so far on the situation.

    A source close to the royal family has called on the Sussexes to speak out and defend their relatives as their silence is “deafening”, according to The Telegraph.

    TV host Piers Morgan defended his decision to identify the two members of the royal family at the centre of the furore, saying it was “blindingly obvious” they were not guilty of racism.

    The Dutch version of Endgame was pulled from the shelves, the publisher dismissing the edition containing the names as a “translation error”.

    Mr Scobie told Newsnight it was not for him to apologise because he still wanted to know what had happened.

    He said: “The book I edited and signed off on did not have names in it.”

    1701512287

    Boris Johnson weighs in on royal racism row

    Former UK prime Minister Boris Johnson has called the racism row surrounding the royal family “normal” and “not remotely racist”.

    The racism row has reared its head once more in the wake of Omid Scobie’s tell-all book, which hit the stands on Tuesday.

    While the English version made no mention of who said what, a misprint in the recalled Dutch translation pointed the finger at two senior royals.

    The revelation of the accused royals made headlines around the world and saw Dutch versions of the book pulled from shelves.

    The former PM wrote in the Daily Mail: “To ask such questions, in anticipation of a happy event, is simple human nature.

    “It is one of the greatest joys and -mysteries of life that we have no real idea, in utero, what our children will look like ... that, I expect, was exactly the kind of ruminative debate that the so-called royal racist was having.”

    The former prime minister went on to use his op-ed to attack “wokery and cancel culture”, which he believes is at the heart of the latest royal fiasco.

    He said: “Frankly, I neither know nor care which royal said something about Archie, but I am certain that he or she was not remotely racist.

    “It’s time to stop all this nonsense, and re-draw the distinction between the ugliness of racism and prejudice - against which we have abundant statutes - and ordinary, innocent patterns of human thought and behaviour.”

    (PA Wire)

    Maryam Zakir-Hussain2 December 2023 10:18

    1701510739

    Voices: Why won’t Prince Harry speak out to defend his dad?

    As the royal ‘exposer-in-chief’ Omid Scobie is lambasted for betraying so many private conversations with his gossipy book ‘Endgame’, Harry’s biographer Angela Levin asks why has there been no word from the Sussexes.

    The test to determine whether Harry and Meghan were involved with Omid Scobie’s new book, Endgame, is to see if Prince Harry sues him. Harry dislikes anyone breaching his privacy and is a regular at the high courts.

    Similarly, Meghan isn’t known to be slow in calling out intrusion when private correspondence is thrust into the public domain. It is something she has done before, and after the contents of private letters exchanged between King Charles have been exposed, why not now?

    Why won’t Prince Harry speak out to defend his dad?

    As the royal ‘exposer-in-chief’ Omid Scobie is lambasted for betraying so many private conversations with his gossipy book ‘Endgame’, Harry’s biographer Angela Levin asks why has there been no word from the Sussexes

    Maryam Zakir-Hussain2 December 2023 09:52

    1701506247

    Omid Scobie refuses to apologise after King Charles and Kate named in Dutch book

    Author Omid Scobie has refused to apologise as King Charles and the Princess of Wales were named as the two senior royal figures alleged to have made “concerns” over Prince Harry and Meghan’s son’s skin colour before he was born. Appearing on BBC Newsnight with Victoria Derbyshire on Thursday (30 November), Mr Dobie said: “It's not for me to apologise because I still want to know what's happened.” The 42-year-old was asked if he could “hand on heart” say the naming of the two royals in the Dutch version of Endgame was not a “publicity stunt to sell more books”. Mr Dobie replied: “On my life, on my family's life.”

    Maryam Zakir-Hussain2 December 2023 08:37

    1701503217

    Prince Harry and Meghan’ urged to defend King and Princess of Wales'

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been urged to back the King and Princess of Wales amid accusations of racism.

    Prince Harry and Meghan have so far made no comment after Charles III and Katherine were accused of raising questions about the skin colour of Archie in a Dutch translation of Omid Scobie’s Endgame.

    “For the couple that talked about ‘death by a thousand no comments’, the silence at this point is deafening,” a source close to Prince Harry and Meghan told The Telegraph, as they urged the couple to defend their relatives.

    (Getty Images)

    Maryam Zakir-Hussain2 December 2023 07:46

    1701500400

    Harry and Meghan agreed Spotify deal ‘because they needed serious money’

    Jane Dalton2 December 2023 07:00

    1701498600

    Kate Middleton ‘took elocution lessons’, author says

    Reminder: The Princess of Wales has taken elocution lessons and now sounds more posh than her husband, Omid Scobie claimed:

    Jane Dalton2 December 2023 06:30

    1701496800

    Reminder: How the royal ‘racism' row unfolded

    The Independent recaps the twists and turns of this very modern royal row, starting in 2016:

    Jane Dalton2 December 2023 06:00

    1701495019

    Rishi Sunak praises the King and avoids racism controversy at Cop28

    Rishi Sunak refrained from commenting on a royal controversy surrounding allegations of racism while commending the King for his role in international climate talks.

    Asked about the controversy as he flew to Dubai for the Cop28 climate talks, Mr Sunak told reporters: “By longstanding and appropriate convention it wouldn’t be right for me to talk about the royal family in any way shape or form.”

    He praised the climate-conscious King and highlighted the UK’s leadership at the climate summit. “I’m delighted that he’s going to be at Cop tomorrow, he’s giving a call to arms in the opening statement,” Mr Sunak said.

    “It speaks volumes about our type of leadership as a country that we’ve got our head of state there, delivering a call to arms in the opening statement which speaks volumes about the respect that he’s got on this issue around the world.

    “We’ve got the head of government there in me, and we’ve got our chief diplomat there in the Foreign Secretary. There are very few countries that will be able to say what I’ve just said.

    “So that speaks again to our leadership on this issue and particularly His Majesty’s longstanding track record championing this issue and I’m delighted that he’s going to be delivering this very important statement tomorrow.”

    Shweta Sharma2 December 2023 05:30

    1701493200

    Opinion: People can be unthinking, Meghan

    Jane Dalton2 December 2023 05:00

    1701490375

    Monarchy has suffered ‘long-lasting reputational damage’

    The monarchy has suffered “long-lasting reputational damage” and it is going to affect the whole family as well as the institutions, a royal commentator has said.

    Joe Little of Majesty magazine said that the doubts are enough to cause damage to the royal family and monarchy as a whole due to the racism row.

    “The allegations, true or untrue, will clearly put doubt in the minds of people who are aware of the individuals who have been named. That can’t be helpful in any shape or form.

    “But mud sticks, once the shadow of doubt is there, it never really goes away, and it’s got to impact not only on the individuals but also the institution as a whole - it’s a long-lasting reputational damage,” he said.

    Shweta Sharma2 December 2023 04:12

    Read More


    Reader's opinions

    Leave a Reply