This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Economists' verdicts on Trump Covid orders: Too little, too late
President Trump’s weekend attempt to sidestep stalled congressional negotiations over the next coronavirus aid package will do little to boost the economy, experts said.
Mr Trump’s executive order and presidential memoranda, introduced on Saturday, would temporarily extend enhanced unemployment benefits at a reduced amount of $400 a week, defer payroll taxes for some workers, suspend federal student loan payments and potentially provide eviction relief. Even if he can overcome the legal questions surrounding his actions, the efforts may not pack much punch, economists say.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, calculated the orders could provide just over $400bn in total relief. JPMorgan Chase economist Michael Feroli wrote in an email note on Monday that the initiatives could contribute “less than $100 bn” in stimulus.
That’s versus the $1trn aid package proposed by the Republican-led Senate or the more than $3trn aid bill passed by the Democrat-led House of Representatives.
Altogether, the president’s orders would add up to 0.2 per cent of GDP, a “negligible amount,” according to estimates from Lydia Boussour, senior US economist for Oxford Economics.
Millions of jobless Americans could be financially squeezed this month after the expiration of a $600 weekly supplement to unemployment benefits, the winding down of eviction moratoriums across the country and the end of the Paycheck Protection Program, which supported small businesses.
Some of the measures proposed by Trump would take time to set up and could be challenged in court, experts said. “They’re not going to do anybody any good in the here and now,” Mr Zandi said in an interview.
Reuters